RAISE Logo Regional Action and Involvement South East
   
 

History: Home > NGage > Topic Messages


 
Page Branding
Back back

 


Members' Login   Members' Login

You are not logged in. Please click here to log in .



Search Forums   Search Forums

Want to find a relevant topic quickly? Try our forum search:

Search keyword(s):




Forum Help   Forum Help

Having trouble using the forums? Click here to go through our quick tutorial .


This page displays all messages relating to a specific topic. If you are a registered RAISE member and you have logged in, you will be able to post replies to messages.

If you would like to receive email notifications every time a user posts a message relating to this topic, click on the 'Subscribe' link. Once subscribed, you will be notified by email every time a user posts a message relating to this topic.

Topic: RES
Topic Options: You must login in order to use the topic options
Author Message
Roshan Bailey

HEADWAY Surrey
Posted on: 16 June 2002 : 10:31:59 [ To reply to this message you need to be logged in ]
I've been so bogged down in ESF funding applications recently, both SE and London Region, that I have had my fill of all these documents and no time left over for the "luxury" of reading yet another one carefully. Do the gov bodies realise the amount of paper they make us read through in detail and cross ref with our applications? I know Co-Financing is supposed to reduce the actual application paperwork, but we will still have to read the Regional Development Plan, Regional Economic Strategy, all the regional statistics, etc, to put in a decent application. As I said in my contribution to Nigel's other discussion forum, we have to get Gov agencies to work our way, not just more of the same. Incidentally, the SVSC ESF funded mentoring course covered interested ground about thinking styles. An extension of this is that the way in which civil servants et al formulate their consultation and evaluation frameworks is designed around their way of thinking and is totally opaque to many of their target users, so does not have a hope of acheiving the professed aims. It will of course achieve the aim of ticking boxes to show they have taken steps to consult people, but this gets rather circular...!

Nigel Smallbone

RAISE
Posted on: 30 May 2002 : 17:10:16 [ To reply to this message you need to be logged in ]
I read the (draft) RES but found the language extremely discouraging. If SEEDA want to build partnership, they need to communicate in ways potential partners can understand.

Rob Woolley

RAISE
Posted on: 15 May 2002 : 16:27:04 [ To reply to this message you need to be logged in ]
Does anyone read the RES???

Does anyone read anything on the RAISE website?

Does anyone care?


Return to forum topics   Return to forum topics



Get Acrobat Reader  get acrobat ¦  Contact Us  contact us ¦  Copyright and Policies  copyright and policies ¦  RAISE Web site map  site map
Copyright © 2002 RAISE. All rights reserved.